Monday, September 18, 2006

HOW – AND WHY – TO EXPLORE OUTSOURCED DOCUMENT

DOCUMENT OUTSOURCING
HOW – AND WHY – TO EXPLORE OUTSOURCED DOCUMENT
MANAGEMENT

By Jeff Zbar

Consider this proposition: If your company manufactures products or consults on management solutions, should any process beyond your true core competency be internally managed? From facilities management to shipping to document production, any non-core process often better serves the company bottom line when outsourced.

For many businesses, such is the case with document production. Between employing staff to manage an internal copy reprographics department (CRD), to leasing equipment, renting additional office space to house the CRD, and striving to stay atop the latest in technological advances, companies that run their own CRDs often find themselves mired in a money-losing process.

Document outsourcing can lead to convenience and flexibility through scalable document delivery operations. In short, off-site print services can deliver unsurpassed CRD benefits – with out the expense in dollars and productivity typically associated with on-site CRD operations.

Yet how can such an organization release itself from the way business has always been done to capitalize on a new solution?

Many large corporations, and even paper-intensive companies like larger law firms or accounting practices, have made the move to document production outsourcing. Upward of 60% of enterprises outsource some part of their document output needs, according to Gartner, the Boston research firm. Yet many don’t handle the process well. To wit, by 2005, some 75 percent of organizations that fail to properly manage the outsourcing process across its life cycle will not fully realize the benefits the process can deliver, including improved service quality, cost controls and realized objectives, Gartner notes.

Unlike the “outsourcing” that conjures negative connotations in the media, document outsourcing is removing some or all paper document production from a company, and outsourcing it to a domestic external provider. These companies may be located nearby, or in the case of national providers, in many locations nationwide, thereby providing production and logistical benefits unattainable from an internal CRD.

Small to medium businesses (SMB) increasingly are joining Fortune 500 corporations in exploring document outsourcing as a solution to several issues, notes Greg Greenberg, a senior analyst with research consultancy AMI Partners. A confluence of events and motivators, especially in the SMB space, has joined forces to create a suitable climate for change. They include:

Limited qualified staff to manage increasingly complex CRD technology and software solutions, or the need to focus existing staff on other, more important processes.




A desire to focus on the company’s core competency, as opposed to such resource-consuming and non-core processes as printing.
An overall trend to improve print quality, which traditionally could not be accomplished with devices priced reasonably for the SMB organization. Outsourcing or applying leading-edge printing applications “can enable an SMB to look more like a larger firm by showing a certain level of quality at a lower cost,” Greenberg said. And A move away from creation of static documents, including marketing materials, presentations and brochures, which often are printed once in large quantities, then becoming dated or “stale” as they lie awaiting distribution from costly storage facilities. On-demand digital printing provides for just-in-time printing, eliminates need for storage facilities. Documents or parcels then can be drop-shipped directly from a print vendor’s location – without client personnel touching, packing or shipping the materials.

By applying outsourcing or advancements in printing technology, a company can grow – and grow its CRD applications – without hiring new staff or professional CRD managers internally.

Though prices for such devices, especially in the color laser category, have dropped to the sub-$30,000 range, the hard cost doesn’t reflect the actual cost related to an internal, self-managed CRD. Those include the persquare-foot cost of additional space to house the CRD, staffing costs related to operating the department, and the need to ensure the organization has the latest in reprographics hardware and software solutions. And with the move to color for Page 1 of 2 Copyright The Outsourcing Institute 2004.
internally-produced, professional marketing brochures and collateral materials for client outreach and new business development, production and binding equipment needed to put an impressive finish on the documents requires significant capital outlay.

Hence, the initial stages of a move to document production outsourcing begins with the realization that such outsourcing is no longer a tactical cost savings opportunity, but a strategic business practice. The company can free up assets and capital, and pay only for those services actually used – including printing, binding, stapling, boxing and/or shipping or distribution – in the variable-cost model.

THE MOVE TO OUTSOURCED DOCUMENT PRODUCTION

The move to outsourced document production requires careful planning from the top down. The process often is initiated and championed by a C-level financial, operational or information technology executive, who then appoints an individual to oversee solution research. Gartner Research calls this post the “production czar.”

This czar would be tasked with performing a thorough assessment of the company’s existing print production functions and facilities. Typically, when color press runs consistently exceed 1,500 copies per run, analysts believe this is an appropriate occasion to consider outsourcing the process, said Peter Grant, Research Vice President of Gartner’s Digital Documents Imaging Group.

Such an assessment can be accomplished by existing internal staff, or with the guidance of a vendor known for such review and applications. Under this review, tally the number and type of existing equipment, output volume of each device (with specific numbers for color and black and white output), as well as service and supply costs. The goal is to assess the current equipment, service and supply costs on a per page basis, and use those costs as a basis for comparison against the outsourcing proposal. Additionally, this review should reflect where the company is with regard to document outsourcing, as well as where the czar and other champions want it to be.

Though rewards can be achieved, document outsourcing is not without its risks, Grant warns. Among the greatest risks are possible security breaches of documents being produced off-site. For some organizations, production of sensitive documents, which typically represent a minority of print output, remains within the internal CRD or individual copy stations. Disruption of office culture or end-user control also is an issue. This is especially true for those employees unaccustomed to outsourcing print jobs, not physically overseeing the process, or simply walking to a CRD down the hall to fetch a printed job.

Yet rewards found with outsourcing can be numerous and ongoing. The average company spends three percent of its revenue on document output and handling, Gartner notes. Outsourcing can control such costs. Moreover, the client enjoys assistance in managing output needs and an end to technological obsolescence found with purchasing or leasing long-term document production equipment. Internal facility space is freed up as equipment and functions are moved off-site.
And finally, and for some, most importantly, the company is able to focus on its core business – which almost certainly can generate more money for the business than overseeing a CRD.

Moreover, an outsource solution can allow an expansion-minded company to grow more rapidly following mergers and acquisitions. By integrating an existing unified, holistic document outsource solution into the newly acquired operation, duplication and waste is eliminated and operations are streamlined.

REGULATIONS SPUR DOCUMENT OUTSOURCING

As increased state and federal regulations control how certain companies and industries operate in the 21st Century, appropriate use of document outsourcing can play a critical role in ensuring rules and regulations are adhered to.

The spate of corporate malfeasance that led to the Sarbanes-Oxley Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 now require greater document management and internal control. Additionally, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 requires control and tracking of patient records, with strict adherence to patient confidentiality. Variable data printing options, when combined with bar-coding and database management, ensure that patient data is protected, while the organization is able to capitalize on cost benefits found with document outsourcing.

The variable-cost pricing model of outsourced document production allows organizations to meet these regulatory requirements, while also improving bottom-line results.

For many companies, outsourcing also delivers significant production and workflow benefits over internally operating a CRD. Print technology deployed by external vendors often easily outperforms those used at an internal CRD.
These machines allow for heavier production schedules and volumes, more complicated printing applications and more powerful technology overseen by skilled and dedicated staff.

Finally, depending on the vendor selected, all phases of job management, from submission to revisions to job monitoring, are handled online via password protected sites. This allows for creation of variable-data printing solutions – at variable-cost printing prices – formerly unattainable from traditional outsource printing vendors. The use of such data allows documents to be personalized with specific customer data, which therefore can improve customer satisfaction.
When married with client expectations and contracted applications and services, the relationship becomes more productive and rewarding.

“That’s the innovation that’s occurring with technology,” Grant said. “It’s just rethinking what we’re doing. It’s a transformation play. Why do you want to go to outsourcing? Because I’m changing the way I compete in business.”
.

IT Infrastructure Outsourcing

The Key To IFO Success: Assessment

An Outsourcing Definition:
The conscious business decision to move internal work to an external
supplier with whom your company develops a mutually beneficial and
strategic relationship.

With infrastructure in its various capacities acting as the backbone for most businesses, infrastructure availability has become a mission-critical necessity for growing enterprises. Organizations evolving with today's fluctuating business climate face the challenges of managing and maintaining their increasingly complex business center operations and various infrastructure areas.
As a result, many successful businesses are turning to infrastructure
outsourcing as a way to maintain a competitive edge. Infrastructure
outsourcing (IFO) enables companies to focus on areas critical to their
strategic success while gaining the advantage of competitive infrastructure
functions, enabling business growth.
There are several keys to successful IFO, including finding a service provider who partners with your organization to help you to evolve strategically and profitably. However, before you can even get to the point of seeking out a service provider, companies must identify those areas within their infrastructure that are good candidates for outsourcing. This assessment phase is key to the ultimate success of a company’s outsourcing ventures. So, how does a company go about assessing their outsourcing needs? A lot of introspection and unbiased evaluation!

What IFO Services Are Out There?
Success in outsourcing depends on how well you define and communicate your IFO needs to potential contractors, and the quality of the relationship you develop with your chosen service provider. The goal of IFO is to bring in experts to serve your infrastructure needs more efficiently than you can on your own,
freeing you to dedicate more of your resources to your organization's core competencies. There are several types of IFO that can be utilized within one company including business processes, IT, enterprise support and manufacturing processes.
• Business Processes (BPO): is the delegation, to a third party, of the management, operation of a company process, to allow the company to improve its productivity, efficiency, and competitiveness.
• IT (ITO): is the delegation of IT infrastructure, application development, maintenance, and support to an external provider to improve performance of this critical support service.
• Manufacturing Processes (MPO): is the delegation of product manufacturing to an external provider to improve the a) development, b) production, fabrication, assembly, or c) post-production support of that product. Establishing a relationship with a third-party to support the manufacturing process joins the strengths of both companies to go to market sooner, produce a superior product or extend the market penetration of the product.
• Enterprise Support (ESO): is the Facilities Management Services that support the company’s premises and its occupants. This can include Administrative Support Services that enable the company to operate more effectively, e.g.: travel desk, teleconferencing support, and fleet maintenance. Within each of these categories, a company may outsource day-to-day maintenance and administration, or planning and design. Making a decision about what to outsource should depend primarily on the capabilities and needs of the organization and the knowledge and expertise of the staff.

Assessing Your Needs
The assessment phase can be one of the more difficult stages of the outsourcing process, simply because there are more than likely going to be political, emotional and financial factors motivating the decision- making process. If handled systematically and without bias, however, this stage in the outsourcing process
can be extremely productive and will directly contribute to long-term IFO success. According to Lew Houck, Senior Associate of the Outsourcing Institute (OI), “The first step is to clearly understand the operational requirements of the business units that are supported by the infrastructure – both current and planned. While
an IFO may be initiated in the interests of economy or enhanced technology, the day-to-day effect to the end user community should range from ‘business-as-usual’ to ‘much improved functionality.’”

The next step in determining which functions are potential IFO candidates, is to identify those functions that are strategic to your company’s core business and those which are supporting or non-strategic. With these key areas identified, the next step is to identify functions or segments of functions that can be outsourced.
Again, it is imperative to thoughtfully seek out those portions of infrastructure functions that are non-core to the company’s main source of revenue.

Houck recommends that companies develop a realistic set of outsourcing options based on existing and future needs of the company. “An unbiased approach is especially important for IFO. By its very nature the infrastructure is ubiquitous within the organization and to the user community. An unbiased approach
assures that every organization is heard and that every input is given equal consideration. The result is an assessment that is focused on the most positive impact to the business as a whole,” commented Houck. Looking to the future is a large part of the assessment phase. Identifying long-term business goals and
growth opportunities will guide companies in targeting mission critical functions. OI offers a set of probing questions that your company should ask when completing any IFO assessment exercise:

1. Where are we today?
2. Where must we improve?
3. What new requirements do we face?
4. What are our critical issues?
5. What business objectives must outsourcing satisfy?
6. What options other than outsourcing are available?
7. Which functions, if any, are good candidates for outsourcing?
8. Can outsourcing support our business direction?
9. Does outsourcing represent a good “fit” with the company?
10. Can outsourcing reduce costs at a sustainable annual rate of at least x%? If less, are there
compensating benefits such as strategic partnerships?
11. Will outsourcing enable us to maintain the required management control?
12. With outsourcing, can we retain an infrastructure that will enable flexibility for changing business requirements?

Houck offers some tips on how to stay unbiased in your assessment, “When we talk about unbiased, we are usually addressing the intra-organizational issues of politics, influence or such – the ‘unkind bias’. You also need to address the ‘kind bias’. Someone who has grownup in a given functional area will have a natural bias
for the needs of that area. They do not intend to be biased, but they necessarily are biased on the basis of their ability to understand the needs of one area. Using a committee sounds good, but the leader’s interests can be problematic. Using an outside person with the proper knowledge and experience is often the best
choice.”


The Results Are In: Approach Thoughtfully & Cautiously
Once the IFO assessment phase is completed and outsourcing seems to be the desired option, a rigorous and disciplined process should be followed when forming the parameters of the project. OI recommends that companies approach this new venture with enthusiasm, but also with caution. Why? Houck comments,
“Outsourcing the wrong infrastructure function or selecting the wrong outsourcing model can lead to tragic results.” There is a simple fix; however, discipline is the key word in this case.
Constantly test your assumptions on what you believe are the best IFO course throughout the entire process to make sure outsourcing is the right decision. Additionally, clearly identify objectives and fine tune them to the results you are trying to achieve. This may have to be done multiple times throughout the IFO process, but you will reap the financial and strategic rewards of a disciplined approach.

Final Thoughts

Outsourcing any infrastructure needs requires thought, research, and detailed planning. The keys to successful implementation include a disciplined and thoughtful assessment phase, clear communication with vendors, designating specific point people who are responsible for a specific infrastructure aspect, and working to increase the expertise in an organization to enhance strategic direction and compliment core competencies.

Small-Biz Outsourcing Guide

Entrepreneurs
Small-Biz Outsourcing Guide
Mary Crane 08.15.06, 4:35 PM ET

The promise of saving time and money by exploiting technology and inexpensive labor overseas is an old headline. Forrester Research expects the total value of outsourced information-technology services by companies in North America to cross $100 billion--some 960,000 white-collar jobs--by the end of 2006. By 2015, the number of jobs shipped overseas could hit 3.3 million.

Behemoths with sprawling back offices like General Electric (nyse: GE - news - people ) and American Express (nyse: AXP - news - people ) are responsible for much of the shift, but more small businesses are jumping on the outsourcing bandwagon every day. "If other companies are doing it and cutting costs, you have to do that or you'll be out of business," says Vineet Katial, co-founder and chief operating officer of Janeeva, a software services company that manages outsourcing relationships.

Which is not to say that most entrepreneurs who outsource do it well--especially small fries with limited resources to manage the process and ensure quality control.

Confusing matters further, the roster of countries looking for work is expanding, thanks to new players like Argentina, Ghana and Vietnam. While large companies may be able to extract efficiencies from these more exotic locales, small companies at this point are better off sticking with more established hubs, especially India.

In Pictures: The Pros And Cons Of Outsourcing In India

How to navigate thorny outsourcing issues? Follow these steps.

1. Decide what functions to outsource.

Begin by defining, in clear terms, the strengths and weaknesses of your business. Keep your strengths in-house, and farm out your weaknesses. Next, break down business projects into sub-projects, says Atul Vashishtha, chief executive officer of NeoIT, a San Ramon, Calif., outsourcing consulting company.

One of his clients, for example, had to build a new Web site. The client knew it was good at design but probably needed some help with programming. By divvying up what it did well and what its Indian vendor could do better and more efficiently, the client managed to save 60% on the cost of the project, says Vashishtha.

2. Choose a vender--carefully.

Selecting a vendor is hard enough for large companies with fat travel and research budgets, let alone entrepreneurs on a shoestring. Consider India: About 20 outsourcing firms make up 55% of the outsourcing activity there, while about 3,000 up-and-comers account for the other 45%, according to India's National Association for Software and Services Companies.

How to find a reliable partner? Matchmaker Web sites like Elance, iFreelance.com, ScriptLance.com, RentACoder.com and GetAFreelancer.com pair outsourcers with vendors. Elance chief Fabio Rosati says his company posts, on average, about 1,800 new projects on its site each week, up from 1,400 last year.

Other helpful sources include consultancies like Vashishtha's NeoIT, TPI and EquaTerra. And small-business advocacy groups and publications like OOBP.org and SourcingMag.com offer links and certified vendor directories for outsourcers.

3. Craft a sound contract.

All vendors--no matter how capable or trustworthy--should sign a snag-proof contract. Agree, in writing, on an arbiter (say, a law firm) before disagreements crop up (and they will). "Plan now or you pay later," says Janeeva's Katial.

When drafting a contract, clarify not only the specific services you expect to receive, but the quality of the delivery as well. For example, if you are outsourcing your in-house call center, make sure the vendor knows you expect, say, 98% of the call center's incoming calls to be answered within five rings. Or, if your vendor has taken on server maintenance for your company, state in the contract that your servers should be up and running 99% of the time.

"The small-business guy should look out for the fact that vendors make a lot of their money on charging for services you might otherwise have thought were included," warns Stuart Levi, a lawyer at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom who specializes in information technology and e-commerce.

Finally, be strategic about how to pay for the service--be it at a fixed rate per employee per hour, a rate tied to performance, or a lump-sum cost. For example, a small airline might outsource its customer-service unit at a rate per phone operator, while a bank might farm out its loan-processing operation and pay per loan. However you hammer out payment terms, be sure to explore all the options relative to your company's cash position.

Tempting as it is to save money by going offshore, the fact is that without the right planning, outsourcing can suck profits--not supercharge them. "Don't skimp on the transition," says Simon Bell, director of A.T. Kearney's Global Business Policy Council, which publishes an annual index of countries best suited to handle outsourced work. "Spend time and processing to communicate on both ends to make sure there's a smooth transition."